Legal Opinion

Bloniarz v. Roloson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1969No. L. A. No. 29596PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

On December 6, 1966, the Municipal Court of the Santa Monica Judicial District entered a default judgment for $1,715 in favor of plaintiff. On September 14, 1967, defendant filed a notice of motion to vacate the judgment and the entry of default upon which it was based on the ground that they “were procured by extrinsic fraud and/or extrinsic mistake.’’ This motion was denied on September 26, 1967. Defendant appeals.

Although plaintiff resisted the motion on the merits, he also urged that a municipal court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a motion to vacate a judgment obtained by…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. De Lancie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Walker v. GiardinaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. McGeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API