Legal Opinion

California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Liemsakul

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1987No. B020873PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) appeals from a declaratory judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Visute Liemsakul (Liemsakul).

Because CIGA is entitled to a credit in the full amount of Liemsakul’s uninsured motorist (UM) coverage, the trial court erred in limiting the

credit to the amount actually recovered under said coverage. However, for the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.

Factual & Procedural Background

On July 6, 1982, a car driven by Liemsakul collided with a truck being driven by Manuel Barrios (Barrios) and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In Re Waters of Long Valley Creek Stream SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. DeVane v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. A.W. Chesterton Co. v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Marshall v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. East Peninsula Education Council, Inc. v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Hasemann v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API