Legal Opinion

Jones v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1994No. D020373PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

— In this case, we are asked to determine the propriety of imposing sanctions on a petition for writ of mandate and request for stay. Sanctions are warranted where counsel omits critical facts intending to create a sense of emergency solely for delay. Because, however, we believe the omissions here were unintended, a product of time pressures combined with short-sighted advocacy, we refrain from imposing sanctions.

Factual and Procedural Background

This petition involves a death penalty case where Principal Attorney Deborah Carson (Carson), a deputy alternate public defender…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Troensegaard v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Lawrence v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Coast Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Pierotti v. TorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. People v. SpectorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Jumaane v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API