Legal Opinion

Roble Vista Associates v. Bacon

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 2002No. H023150PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

The City of Palo Alto enacted the Rental Housing Stabilization Ordinance (Ordinance), 1 which provides that a landlord is required to offer a one-year lease to a prospective tenant. The sole issue on appeal is whether state law preempts the Ordinance. We conclude that it does not and reverse the judgment.

Statement of Facts

When the city council adopted the Ordinance in 1980, it made the following findings: “It is found and declared that there is a growing shortage of, but increasing demand for, housing in the City of Palo Alto. Such shortage and increased demand, coupled with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Claremont v. KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Rental Housing Assn. of Northern Alameda County v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Sequoia Park Associates v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. California Veterinary Medical Ass'n v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Gonzales v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API