Legal Opinion

In Re Hubbard

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1964No. Crim. 7824PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Horace H. Hubbard, Jack J. Gerard, Jack Soglofsky, Tillie Oberman, Floyd D. Thogmartin, and Hal Miller (hereinafter referred to as “defendants”) were arrested on a charge of violating section 4140.7 of the Long Beach Municipal Code. The specifications of the charge were that defendants had been playing, for money, and within the city limits of Long Beach, a game of chance played with cards, and known as panguingui. Assuming, without deciding, that panguingui is a game of chance, it is one of the games prohibited by the terms of the ordinance, but is not a “banking or percentage game, ’’ as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API