Legal Opinion

Sequoia Park Associates v. County of Sonoma

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 2009No. A120049PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHMAN, J.

One of the subjects covered by the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.) is the conversion of a mobilehome park from a rental to a resident-ownership basis. One of the provisions on that subject is Government Code section 66427.5 (section 66427.5), which spells out certain steps that must be completed before the conversion application can be approved by the appropriate local body. Although it is not codified in the language of section 66427.5, the Legislature recorded its intent that by enacting section 66427.5 it was acting “to ensure that conversions ... are…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. First Resort, Inc. v. Dennis HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Chino MHC v. City of ChinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. 218 Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API