Legal Opinion
City of Claremont v. Kruse
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 27, 2009No. B210084PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHAVEZ, J.
Defendants and appellants Darrell Kruse (Kruse) and Claremont All Natural Nutrition Aids Buyers Information Service (also known as CANNABIS) 1 appeal from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent City of Claremont (the City) after the trial court issued a permanent injunction preventing defendants from operating a medical marijuana dispensary anywhere within the City. We affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
1. Kruse’s Permit Application
In July 2006, Kruse went to Claremont City Hall and asked one of the city planners where he could open a medical marijuana…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Maral v. City of Live OakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Browne v. County of TehamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.