Legal Opinion

Rental Housing Assn. of Northern Alameda County v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2009No. A114855. No. A114919PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIGGINS, J.

A group of Oakland landlords sought a writ of mandate from the trial court to prohibit enforcement of Oakland’s Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance (Ordinance) that was adopted as initiative Measure EE at the general election in November 2002. The trial court determined that certain provisions of the measure are preempted by state law and others are not. The court also concluded that the invalid portions of Measure EE are severable from the rest of the Ordinance and the remainder of the Ordinance may be enforced. Both sides appeal.

We affirm the trial court and conclude that a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. RobelSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Chacon v. LitkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Larson v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Sequoia Park Associates v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Moriarty v. Laramar Management CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API