Legal Opinion

San Diego Realty Co. v. Cornell

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1907No. L.A. No. 1709PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, George A. Sturtevant, Deputy Attorney-General, and Cassius Carter, District Attorney, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the defendants, who are county officers of San Diego County, for the purpose of enjoining them as county officers from issuing tax-deeds to certain of its property, following assessment and sale. Plaintiff alleges that the assessment was void, and avers that the defendants propose to execute the tax-deed to the state of California, conveying its land so attempted to be assessed by the void assessment; that the deed so made will cast a cloud upon plaintiff’s title; that had the property been assessed according to law] the taxes assessed against it would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Miller v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Esterbrook v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ellis v. WitmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. San Diego Realty Co. v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Chapman v. ZoberleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Stough v. ReevesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Hotchkiss v. HansbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API