Legal Opinion

Vanasek v. Pokorny

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1925No. Docket No. 5135PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

The action was commenced by plaintiff, Edna Vanasek, to quiet title to certain land in Alameda County as against Frank Strybl, appellant herein, Erzsi Novak, respondent, Joe Novak, the husband of respondent and others. Respondent filed her answer to the complaint denying the alleged title of plaintiff, and therewith her cross-complaint against appellant, alleging therein her marriage to Joe Novak on June 1, 1914, and that at all times thereafter they continued to be husband and wife, the acquisition of the land by them on June 17, 1917, in the name of the husband as community property, that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Roberts v. WehmeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fields v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Swasey v. De L'EtancheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Estate of HobartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. California Western Holding Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API