Castro v. Barry
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
—The complaint in this case alleged in substance that the plaintiff was the owner of certain real property; that the defendant claimed an interest therein adverse to the plaintiff; that such claim was without right, and that the defendant had no right, title, or interest whatever in the property. There were other allegations ^hich will be noticed below. The prayer was, that defendant be required to set forth the nature of his claim, that it be adjudged to be void, and that defendant be enjoined from asserting it. The trial court found the above allegations to be true. Judgment was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis R. R. v. OylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Head v. FordyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Heeser v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Scorpion Silver Mining Co. v. MarsanoNevada Supreme Court · 1875
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
- Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Beal v. Mars Larsen Ranch Corp., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.