Muller v. Muller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment after demurrer of the defendant to the third amended and supplemental complaint of the plaintiff was sustained without leave to amend. Appellant had appealed upon a clerk’s transcript requesting the preparation of the following: “1) Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint for Cancellation and Reeission [sic] of Deed for Fraud and Deceit; For Reconveyance; For Want of Consideration; And to Remove a Cloud (Filed March 9, 1956) 2) Demurer [sic] of Lelah Muller to Third Amended Complaint of William Muller (Filed on or about March 16,1956)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zakaessian v. ZakaessianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Vanasek v. PokornyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Sterling v. GalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Muller v. HallenbeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962