Legal Opinion

Swasey v. De L'Etanche

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1936No. Civ. 9922PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

The general and special demurrer to the fourth amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and, accordingly, judgment was entered in favor of defendants for their costs. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment, arguing that the complaint stated a cause of action and that therefore the court erred in sustaining the demurrer without granting leave to amend. Although the order did not state the grounds upon -which the demurrer was sustained, the judgment must be affirmed if the demurrer was good upon any ground therein stated. (Penziner v. West American Finance Co., 133…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Saporta v. BarbagelataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API