Legal Opinion

State v. Thornton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1960No. 724PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Defendant, as he had a right to do, filed in this Court a written motion in arrest of the judgment of the Superior Court, upon the ground of insufficiency of the indictment. Rule 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, 558; S. v. Lucas, 244 N.C. 53, 92 S.E. 2d 401.

It is an essential of juridiction that a criminal offense shall be sufficiently charged in a warrant or an indictment. S. v. Wallace and Holder ante, 378, 111 S.E. 2d 714; S. v. Strickland, 243 N.C. 100 89 S.E. 2d 781; S. v. Thorne, 238 N.C. 392, 78 S.E. 2d 140; S. v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166.

This Court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. McDonald.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. State v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. PorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API