State v. Nugent
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPaRicbr, J.
The bill of indictment has two counts: one for larceny, and one for receiving stolen property knowing it to have been stolen. The description of the property in the larceny count is a “quantity of meat of the value of fifteen hundred dollars, of the goods, chattels and moneys of one R & S Packing Company.” A similar description occurs in the receiving count. Are the descriptions of the property in the two counts of the bill of indictment sufficient?
It is an essential of jurisdiction that a criminal offense shall be sufficiently charged in a warrant or an indictment. S. v. Thorne, 238 N.C.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- The People v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- State v. ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. DeetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.