Legal Opinion

State v. Nugent

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1955No. 444PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaRicbr, J.

The bill of indictment has two counts: one for larceny, and one for receiving stolen property knowing it to have been stolen. The description of the property in the larceny count is a “quantity of meat of the value of fifteen hundred dollars, of the goods, chattels and moneys of one R & S Packing Company.” A similar description occurs in the receiving count. Are the descriptions of the property in the two counts of the bill of indictment sufficient?

It is an essential of jurisdiction that a criminal offense shall be sufficiently charged in a warrant or an indictment. S. v. Thorne, 238 N.C.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The People v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. State v. ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. DeetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API