Legal Opinion

State v. Scofield

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 22, 1968No. 2 CA-CR 95PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction of theft by embezzlement of a car rented by the defendant from a car-rental agency.

The defendant entered into a rental contract with “Econo-Car of Tucson” on July 15, 1966, of a 1966 Plymouth Belvedere. The written contract provided that the car would be returned “Not later than: 7/25/66 2:30 PM.” There was no deposit paid on the rental, the defendant’s credit being accepted by the rental agency on the basis of a credit card issued by another car-rental system. The written contract indicated the car was to be used in the States of Arizona and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. State v. PrinceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API