State v. Porth
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
Before pleading to the indictment the defendant filed a written, duly verified motion requesting, in the alternative, that the cause be removed to, or that a jury be drawn from, another county as contemplated by G.S. 1-84 and G.S. 1-86. In support of the motion the defendant offered 25 affidavits, in each of which a citizen of the county stated that in his opinion, because of the widespread discussion and unfavorable publicity, the defendant could not obtain a fair trial in Forsyth County. The State filed approximately an equal number of affidavits and called four witnesses, each expressing…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.