Legal Opinion

State v. . Whitehurst

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1937PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNHILL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Criminal prosecution in which the defendant as receiver of the Bank of Vanceboro is charged with embezzlement.

The indictment charges that in May, 1924, the defendant was duly appointed receiver for the Bank of Vanceboro, a State banking institution, and that, as such, in the exercise of a public trust and as agent, consignee, clerk, employee and servant of the court and of the depositors, stockholders and creditors of the insolvent bank, he was entrusted with and did receive and take into his possession and have under…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. United States v. WeitzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. State v. . BarksdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. . EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Harrison v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API