Legal Opinion

State v. . Morgan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1946PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendant does not bring forward his exception to the denial of his motion in arrest of judgment. Even so it raises a jurisdictional question which compels our attention. S. v. Clarke, 220 N. C., 392, 17 S. E. (2d), 468.

It is a universal rule that no indictment, whether at common law or under a statute, can be good if it does not accurately and clearly allege all the constituent elements of the offense charged. S. v. Johnson, 188 N. C., 591, 125 S. E., 183.

A valid warrant or indictment is an essential of jurisdiction. S. v. Beasley, 208 N. C., 318, 180 S. E., 598; S. v. Rawls, 203 N. C.,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Shepard v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . GoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. State v. . McKnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. State v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API