Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Ruiz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 30, 1968No. 40910PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
The sole question on this appeal is whether the 30-day notice-of-claim requirement and 1-year limitation provision of Minn. St. 1961, § 465.09, apply to bar plaintiffs’ action for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff, Gary Schultz, when he was assaulted after attending a dance conducted on premises owned and controlled by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Paul and known as John J. McDonough Homes.
It is undisputed for the purposes of this appeal that the action, based upon a claim of negligence, is against the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Knowles v. Housing Authority of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Judd v. LandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Cassidy v. ConstantineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Buman v. SturnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of CambridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- McCaleb v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Northern Border Pipeline Co. v. JACKSON CTY., ETC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Miller v. ChouSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Sherek v. Independent School District No. 699Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.