Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Constantine

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 9, 1929PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C.J.

This is an action by a husband to recover expenses for medical attendance, nursing and medicine incurred by him as a result of injuries sustained by his wife through the negligence of the defendant. Testimony was excluded' to the effect that probably as a further future result of such injuries an operation and additional treatment at an estimated cost would become necessary. A requested ruling that if the plaintiff were entitled to recover, he might recover for probable future expenses in treating his wife for the injuries sustained by her was *57denied. The correctness of these rulings is the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nolin v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Feneff v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Butler v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Erickson v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Clarke v. . Eighth Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Rodgers v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Patusco v. Prince MacAroni, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. Daniels v. CelesteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Chelsea Moving & Trucking Co. v. Ross Towboat Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API