Legal Opinion
Sherek v. Independent School District No. 699
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 26, 1989No. C8-88-1284PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Independent School District No. 699 acted in accordance with Minnesota law in denying appellant recall rights based on the consolidation of the school districts through an interdistrict cooperation agreement.
FACTS
The facts are essentially undisputed. Appellant Donald Sherek began teaching industrial arts in the Gilbert school district in the 1968/69 school year. At the end of the 1981/82 school year, Sherek was placed on unrequested leave of absence (ULA).
Four years later, the Gilbert and Eveleth school districts began negotiations for merger. Because of financial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Berland v. Special School District No. 1, MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State ex rel. Interstate Air-Parts, Inc. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Salmen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Renstrom v. Independent School District No. 261Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sherek v. Independent School Dist. No. 699, GilbertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Harms v. Independent School District No. 300Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Sherek v. Independent School Dist. No. 699, GilbertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Sherek v. Independent School Dist. No. 699, GilbertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Sherek v. Independent School District No. 699Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989