Legal Opinion
Miller v. Chou
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 3, 1977No. 46755PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Justice.
This is an appeal from denial of a motion for summary judgment in Hennepin County District Court, which order certified the issue of the immunity of the Regents of the University of Minnesota as important and doubtful. Pursuant to Rule 103.03(i), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, the Regents appeal. We remand for further proceedings.
In June 1973, plaintiffs Jerald and Carol Miller were referred for the care of their newly born son to the University of Minnesota Hospitals by a doctor in St. Cloud. Troy Miller, then 1-day old, was admitted to the hospital with an enlarged head.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Taylor v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Papenhausen v. SchoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Schaeffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS COM'N v. Univ. of Minn.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.