Legal Opinion

Strauch v. San Mateo Junior College District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1930No. Docket No. 6904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to recover the value, or in lieu thereof the possession, of certain electrical heating equipment furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant. The cause was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts. Findings and conclusions of law were expressly waived and judgment was entered against the defendant for the value of the equipment.

The facts are as follows: About the month of December, 1927, the clerk of defendant’s board of trustees placed an order with plaintiff for several electrical heaters to be installed in defendant’s school building, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Foxen v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Miller v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Floyd County v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Davis v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Thomas Kelly & Sons, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Brown v. BozemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Berger v. Sequoia Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API