Thomas Kelly & Sons, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff recovered judgment for work done in connection with construction of a bridge across Los Angeles River on Los Feliz Boulevard. Defendant appeals.
A contract had been entered into between the parties in October, 1924, pursuant to a bid submitted by plaintiff. The plans and specifications showed that the bridge was to rest upon concrete piers which in turn were to rest upon pilings. When excavation was started a rock formation was encountered in the river bottom, but plaintiff went ahead and completed the bridge. Defendant paid plaintiff the sum of $11,670.52 in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Wunderlich v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Wiechmann Engineers v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.