Legal Opinion

Thomas Kelly & Sons, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1935No. Civ. 9182PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for work done in connection with construction of a bridge across Los Angeles River on Los Feliz Boulevard. Defendant appeals.

A contract had been entered into between the parties in October, 1924, pursuant to a bid submitted by plaintiff. The plans and specifications showed that the bridge was to rest upon concrete piers which in turn were to rest upon pilings. When excavation was started a rock formation was encountered in the river bottom, but plaintiff went ahead and completed the bridge. Defendant paid plaintiff the sum of $11,670.52 in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wunderlich v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Wiechmann Engineers v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API