Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Techow v. Pollack

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1952No. Civ. 18829PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

Plaintiff alleged in her complaint that she executed for delivery and put into escrow her promissory note for $26,750, secured by a trust deed on her real property; that by certain transactions in the escrow defendant Barnett Pollack paid her $20,000 only for her note; that the difference of $6,750 between the amount stated in the note and the amount paid was a bonus, contrary to the usury laws of the State of California.

Plaintiff prayed that the superior court determine what balance was due from her to defendant, on the basis of an original indebtedness of $20,000, without interest; that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huber v. ShedoudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Martin v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Harris v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Hellier v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hewlett v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Genis v. KrasneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Nevin v. SalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Pacific Custom Pools, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API