Legal Opinion
Nevin v. Salk
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1975No. Civ. 13782PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KERRIGAN, J.
In 1970, Robert B. Nevin and his wife (“Nevin”) purchased the Desert Animal Hospital in Palm Springs from Herman M. Salk and his wife (“Salk”) for $200,000, payable $25,000 down, with the $175,000 balance represented by a $146,000 secured note and a $29,000 unsecured note. After closing escrow, taking possession, and making payments totaling $8,000 on the secured note and $4,500 on the unsecured obligation, Nevin defaulted. Salk commenced foreclosure proceedings. Nevin then sued Salk for fraud in connection with the sale, seeking rescission, restitution of monies paid…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bargioni v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Wagner v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Melnyk v. RobledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Michael-Regan Co. v. LindellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Torrey Pines Bank v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.