Legal Opinion

Hellier v. Russell

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1902No. S.F. No. 2143PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor. This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage securing a note reading as follows:—

“San Francisco, November 24, 1891. On the 24th day of November, 1892, for value received, we jointly and severally, promise to pay to the order of Michael J. Beilley the sum of one thousand dollars, with interest monthly in advance, at the rate of one per cent per month, and to compound monthly if not so paid,” etc.

The complaint in the action was filed and suit begun on November 13, 1896; and in said complaint it is alleged that the defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edwards v. GrandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cape Charles Bank, Inc. v. Farmers Mutual Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  2. Techow v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Ramsey v. FurlottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Kellam v. BrodeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API