Legal Opinion
Pacific Custom Pools, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 2000No. B122853PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BERLE, J. *
On this consolidated appeal, Pacific Custom Pools, Inc., challenges the trial court’s granting of summary judgment based on the failure of Pacific Custom Pools to substantially comply with the contractor’s licensing requirements, and Turner Construction Company questions the court’s denial of its attorney’s fees. We hold that the trial court properly granted summary judgment but erred in denying attorney’s fees.
Factual Background and Procedural History
Universal City Studios, Inc. (Universal) entered into a general contract with Turner Construction Company (Turner) for the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Century Surety Co. v. PolissoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- WSS Industrial Construction, Inc. v. Great West Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Walt Rankin & Associates, Inc. v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- R.W.L. Enters. v. Oldcastle, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.