Legal Opinion
Martin v. Gibson
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 1941No. Civ. 6679PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. The complaint was filed on May 8, 1930. On April 12, 1932, the defendants filed the following answer:
“Now come defendants Andrew A. Gibson, Ruth B. Gibson and Emma G. Trebilcot, and for answer to plaintiff’s complaint on file herein admit each, every and all of the allegations in said complaint contained. Wherefore, having fully answered said complaint said defendants pray for such relief therein as they are entitled to by law.”
On May 15, 1939, defendants filed a notice of motion to dismiss under section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mulcahy v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Prescott v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Huber v. ShedoudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Allyne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Sprajc v. Scandinavian Airlines System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Gonzales v. BrennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Techow v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.