Legal Opinion
Hewlett v. Evans
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1922No. Civ. No. 2392PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, on the ground that the facts stated therein do not constitute a cause of action, was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the defendants for costs.
From the allegations of the complaint it appears that on July 27, 1917, the defendants executed and delivered their promissory note for $16,000, payable three years after date, to R. O. Hobson and, as security for the payment thereof, made and delivered to Joseph F. Carlston and Harry A. Mosher, as trastee, a deed to certain lands. November 14, 1917, Hobson…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huber v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Williams v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Jones v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Pacific Custom Pools, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Techow v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952