Legal Opinion
Cooperman v. R.G. Barry Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1991No. Civ. 4-91-633PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss Count VI of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The motion will be granted.
FACTS
Defendant Barry Corporation markets, designs and manufactures slippers and other footwear products under various brand names and distributes its products to various retail establishments. Plaintiff Rodney L. Cooperman is the president and principal of plaintiff Rodney L. Cooperman Manufacturer’s Representatives, Inc. Plaintiffs will be referred to collectively as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Juanita Robinson v. Mfa Mutual Insurance Company and Countryside Casualty Company D/B/A Mfa Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Kovatovich v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.