Legal Opinion
Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1995No. C5-95-80PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellants Candace M. and E. Terry Ban-bury (the Banburys) challenge summary judgment for Omnitrition International, Inc. (Omnitrition), in an action involving termination of the Banburys’ distributorship. Om-nitrition cross-appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to dismiss the action on grounds of improper venue. We affirm.
FACTS
Omnitrition manufactures nutritional and health products, distributing them through a multilevel marketing organization. This organization involves a network of distributors referred to as Independent Marketing Associates (IMAs).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Sound of Music Co. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.