Legal Opinion

Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1988No. Civ. 3-85-1599PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RENNER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and declaratory judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and 57. On October 23, 1987, the Court held a hearing on the motions and took them under advisement. The Court also heard arguments on defendant’s in limine motions brought pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 401, 402, 403, 404, and 407. These non-dis-positive motions will be addressed in a separate opinion.

Defendant G.D. Searle attacks plaintiffs’ seven count complaint on numerous grounds. First, defendant seeks summary judgment…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  4. Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API