Legal Opinion

Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1989No. Civ. 4-87-517, 4-87-586PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.......................................................... 798

PARTIES................................................................. 799

A. The Defendants................................................ 800

B. The Plaintiffs.................................................. 800

FACTUAL BACKGROUND................................................ 802

A. The Haagen-Dazs Franchise.................................... 802

B. Plaintiffs’ Allegations........................................... 804

DISCUSSION............................................................. 806

I.BREAC…

2Cases cited131 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. ABC International Traders, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API