Legal Opinion

Lamonica v. Holmes

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 28, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] The employer, Ladd Holmes, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting the employee’s petition for restoration related to a 1977 injury. Although the employee suffered a subsequent injury in 1995 while employed by a second employer, the Board concluded that the subsequent injury was nonwork-related because the employee failed to give timely notice of that injury to preserve his workers’ compensation claim against his second employer, 39-A M.R.S.A. § 301 (Supp.1997). Ladd Holmes contends that the employee’s 1995 injury should have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Wentzell v. Timberlands, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Murray v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. LaPointe v. United Engineers & ConstructorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cust v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Maine Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FolsomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Goff v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. Arsenault v. J.A. Thurston Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API