Lamonica v. Holmes
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] The employer, Ladd Holmes, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting the employee’s petition for restoration related to a 1977 injury. Although the employee suffered a subsequent injury in 1995 while employed by a second employer, the Board concluded that the subsequent injury was nonwork-related because the employee failed to give timely notice of that injury to preserve his workers’ compensation claim against his second employer, 39-A M.R.S.A. § 301 (Supp.1997). Ladd Holmes contends that the employee’s 1995 injury should have been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beaulieu v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Wentzell v. Timberlands, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Murray v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- LaPointe v. United Engineers & ConstructorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cust v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Maine Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FolsomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Goff v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Arsenault v. J.A. Thurston Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.