Legal Opinion

Cust v. University of Maine

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 9, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] The University of Maine appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board, granting, in part, its petition for review, but without ordering any reduction in the University’s ongoing liability to Carolyn Cust for her 60% partial incapacity caused by work-related injuries in 1984 and 1988. The University sought, in its petition for review, to reduce its liability for the 1988 injury because the employee had received 400 weeks of partial benefits for that injury. See 39 M.R.S.A. § 55-B (Pamph. 1988), repealed and replaced by P.L.1991, ch. 885, §§ A-7, A-8…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Morgan-Leland v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Ray v. Carland Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  5. McDonald v. Rumford School DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bernier v. Data General Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. Russell v. RUSSELL'S APPLIANCE SERVICESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Dunson v. South Portland Housing AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  4. Legassie v. Securitas, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  5. Miller v. Spinnaker CoatingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API