Legal Opinion

Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 8, 1994PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

The employer, Sheridan D. Smith, Inc., appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying its petition for apportionment in a successive injury case involving a 1982 work injury and a second injury incurred while the employee was self-employed and not covered by the Act. We affirm the decision of the Board.

The employee, Donald Harding, worked as a truck driver and bulldozer operator for Sheridan D. Smith, from 1981 until 1989. On January 5,1982, Harding suffered a compen-sable injury to his hip and back. In the spring of 1989, Harding quit his job with Smith and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Scott's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  3. LeBlanc v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Dorey v. Forster Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Brackett v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Whitney v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. LaPointe v. United Engineers & ConstructorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Cust v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Lamonica v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API