Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Commercial Union Insurance Company appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board. The first issue on appeal is whether Commercial Union’s failure to timely controvert a claim of injury pursuant to the former early pay system, 39 M.R.S.A. § 51-B (1989), repealed by P.L.1991, ch. 885, § A-7, precludes it from seeking an apportionment against a previous insurer pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 354 (Supp.1998), amended by P.L.1999, ch. 354, § 9. We conclude that the Board erred in determining that Commercial Union is unable to seek of appor tionment liability in light of its section…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stickles v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Wentworth v. Manpower Temporary ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott PaperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Kennedy v. Brunswick Convalescent CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Rosetti v. Land ReclamationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maine Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FolsomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Juliano v. AMERI-CANA TRANSPORTSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Roy v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008