Legal Opinion

Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 19, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] Commercial Union Insurance Company appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board. The first issue on appeal is whether Commercial Union’s failure to timely controvert a claim of injury pursuant to the former early pay system, 39 M.R.S.A. § 51-B (1989), repealed by P.L.1991, ch. 885, § A-7, precludes it from seeking an apportionment against a previous insurer pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 354 (Supp.1998), amended by P.L.1999, ch. 354, § 9. We conclude that the Board erred in determining that Commercial Union is unable to seek of appor tionment liability in light of its section…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stickles v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  2. Wentworth v. Manpower Temporary ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott PaperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Kennedy v. Brunswick Convalescent CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Rosetti v. Land ReclamationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maine Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FolsomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Juliano v. AMERI-CANA TRANSPORTSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Roy v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API