Legal Opinion

LaPointe v. United Engineers & Constructors

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 1, 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

In a 1991 decision of the former Workers’ Compensation Commission, United Engineers & Constructors was permitted to offset its obligation to pay weekly workers’ compensation benefits to its employee, Norman LaPointe, by the payments that LaPointe received pursuant to a Massachusetts decree. After LaPointe obtained a lump-sum settlement of his claim against his Massachusetts employer, the Workers’ Compensation Board granted LaPointe’s petition for an order of payment, ruling that United Engineers was no longer entitled to the offset and must reinstate weekly benefits. Because…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Stanley v. Hinchliffe & KennerMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Mizrahi's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. LeBlanc v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Loud v. Kezar Falls Woolen Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Lamonica v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Kotch v. American Protective Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  4. Edwards v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Legassie v. Securitas, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API