Legal Opinion
Maine Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Folsom
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 23, 2001No. CUM-00-308PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Two Workers’ Compensation insurers, Liberty Mutual Insurance and Hanover Insurance Company, appeal a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Delahanty, J.), declaring that the insurers may not seek an apportionment against Maine Insurance Guaranty Association (MIGA) for the proportionate share of the employee Robert A. Folsom’s workers’ compensation benefits owed by an insolvent insurer, American Mutual Insurance Company, pursuant to 24-A M.R.S.A. § 4443 (2000). We affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] The facts are not in dispute. Folsom suffered three work-related…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ventulett v. Maine Insurance Guaranty AssociationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott PaperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Ray v. Carland Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Kennedy v. Brunswick Convalescent CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Rosetti v. Land ReclamationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackson Brook Institute, Inc. v. Maine Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Aramark Leisure Services v. KendrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Edwards v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Juliano v. AMERI-CANA TRANSPORTSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Dennis G. Crosen v. Blouin Motors., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.