State Ex Rel. Romley v. Martin
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
¶ 1 Under the “Drug Medicalization, Prevention, and Control Act of 1996,” an initiative proposal adopted by the voters as Proposition 200 and subsequently codified at Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01 (Supp.2002), a person convicted for the first or second time of “personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia” may not be sentenced to a term of imprisonment. 1 We granted review in this case to decide whether such “Proposition 200 convictions” can be used for impeachment purposes under Rule 609(a)(1) of the Arizona Rules…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MalloyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CampoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In Re NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- State of Arizona v. Joel Agustin LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.