Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Romley v. Martin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2003No. CV-02-0267-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Justice.

¶ 1 Under the “Drug Medicalization, Prevention, and Control Act of 1996,” an initiative proposal adopted by the voters as Proposition 200 and subsequently codified at Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01 (Supp.2002), a person convicted for the first or second time of “personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia” may not be sentenced to a term of imprisonment. 1 We granted review in this case to decide whether such “Proposition 200 convictions” can be used for impeachment purposes under Rule 609(a)(1) of the Arizona Rules…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. MalloyArizona Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. CampoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. In Re NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State of Arizona v. Joel Agustin LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API