Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Joel Agustin Lopez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 25, 2012No. 2 CA-SA 2012-0032PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 The State of Arizona petitions this court for special action review of the respondent judge’s order dismissing its allegation that real-party-in-interest Joel Lopez is not eligible for probation pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-901.01, commonly known as Proposition 200. See State v. Estrada, 201 Ariz. 247, ¶ 2, 34 P.3d 356, 358 (2001). For the reasons that follow, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

Procedural Background

¶ 2 Lopez was indicted for possession of a narcotic drug and possession of drug paraphernalia. The state filed an allegation that he was ineligible…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Volk v. BrameCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Azore, LLC v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Hiskett v. Hon. lambert/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Polk v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Montgomery v. Kemp ex rel. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API