State of Arizona v. Joel Agustin Lopez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 The State of Arizona petitions this court for special action review of the respondent judge’s order dismissing its allegation that real-party-in-interest Joel Lopez is not eligible for probation pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-901.01, commonly known as Proposition 200. See State v. Estrada, 201 Ariz. 247, ¶ 2, 34 P.3d 356, 358 (2001). For the reasons that follow, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.
Procedural Background
¶ 2 Lopez was indicted for possession of a narcotic drug and possession of drug paraphernalia. The state filed an allegation that he was ineligible…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Volk v. BrameCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Azore, LLC v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Hiskett v. Hon. lambert/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State ex rel. Polk v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. Kemp ex rel. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.