Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 2, 2008No. 2 CA-CV 2007-0104PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this municipal code enforcement action, appellee/cross-appellant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., challenges the trial court’s rulings that the two-year limitations period provided in A.R.S. § 9-462.02(0) did not commence until appellant/cross-appellee City of Tucson actually discovered billboard violations and that billboards in violation of repealed ordinances at the time of repeal can be regulated under the current ordinances that replaced and abrogated prior ordinances. Clear Channel also challenges those portions of the court’s judgment, rendered after a…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. City of North Oaks v. SarpalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Loiselle v. COSAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Bennigno R. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Strategic Development & Construction, Inc. v. 7th & Roosevelt Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API