Legal Opinion

Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2006No. CV-06-0021-PR/APublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 In 2004, David Burnell Smith was elected to serve in the Arizona State Legislature as a Representative from District 7. He chose to run as a publicly funded candidate. In return for the receipt of public funds, he and the other participating candidates each signed a form promising to adhere to the provisions of the Citizens Clean Elections Act, Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) §§ 16-940 to - 961 (Supp.2005), and to the campaign finance rules promulgated by the Arizona Clean Elections Commission. See Ariz. Admin. Code (“A.A.C.”) R2-20-215 to -228. The Citizens…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BenoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Long v. AnsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Southwest Gas Corp. v. IRWIN EX REL. COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. 3RC & Co. v. Boynes Trucking System, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  5. Baker v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API