Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 In 2004, David Burnell Smith was elected to serve in the Arizona State Legislature as a Representative from District 7. He chose to run as a publicly funded candidate. In return for the receipt of public funds, he and the other participating candidates each signed a form promising to adhere to the provisions of the Citizens Clean Elections Act, Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) §§ 16-940 to - 961 (Supp.2005), and to the campaign finance rules promulgated by the Arizona Clean Elections Commission. See Ariz. Admin. Code (“A.A.C.”) R2-20-215 to -228. The Citizens…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BenoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Long v. AnsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Southwest Gas Corp. v. IRWIN EX REL. COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- 3RC & Co. v. Boynes Trucking System, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Baker v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.