State v. Campoy
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner State of Arizona challenges the respondent judge’s order granting real party in interest Leland Florencio Croekwell’s motion in limine to preclude the state from introducing in its ease-in-chief in the underlying criminal proceeding statements Crockwell made to law enforcement officers on three separate occasions: in anticipation of a possible plea agreement, and on two separate occasions pursuant to a truthful-cooperation clause after Crockwell and the state had entered into a plea agreement from which the state subse…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Robert H. Davis, United States of America v. George D. GelestinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. James D. Marks (98-6044), Maurice Navarro Brooks (98-6048), Robert Lee Aguon (98-6216)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. NOCEOCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State of Arizona v. Dustin GillArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Spring v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.