Legal Opinion
Fincham v. Wendt
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 29, 1982No. 81-04246, CA A24269PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
The sole issue in this case is whether a worker engaged in remodeling a cold storage room in a building located on a “hobby farm” is subject to workers’ compensation coverage. Claimant seeks judicial review of a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board that he is a nonsubject worker under the householder exemption. ORS 656.027 provides in relevant part:
“All workers are subject to ORS 656.001 to 656.794 except those nonsubject workers described in the following subsections:
‡ ‡ *
“(2) A worker employed to do gardening, maintenance, repair, remodeling or similar work in or about the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Carlile v. GreeningerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Benavidez v. Sierra Blanca MotorsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Caddy v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Blevins v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Royer v. Touch of Grey RanchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Sorenson v. LaTourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007