Legal Opinion

Fincham v. Wendt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 1982No. 81-04246, CA A24269PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

The sole issue in this case is whether a worker engaged in remodeling a cold storage room in a building located on a “hobby farm” is subject to workers’ compensation coverage. Claimant seeks judicial review of a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board that he is a nonsubject worker under the householder exemption. ORS 656.027 provides in relevant part:

“All workers are subject to ORS 656.001 to 656.794 except those nonsubject workers described in the following subsections:

‡ ‡ *

“(2) A worker employed to do gardening, maintenance, repair, remodeling or similar work in or about the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Carlile v. GreeningerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benavidez v. Sierra Blanca MotorsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Caddy v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Blevins v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Royer v. Touch of Grey RanchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Sorenson v. LaTourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API