Sorenson v. LaTour
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Petitioner Sorenson seeks review of a final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board). The order classified Sorenson as a “statutory employer” under ORS 656.029(1) and, therefore, accountable for workers’ compensation benefits for a worker injured during the construction of a house on Sorenson’s farm. ORS 656.029(1) creates that type of accountability when a person contracts for “the performance of labor where such labor is a normal and customary part or process of the person’s trade or business” and the contractor for that work fails to obtain workers’ compensation coverage for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Fincham v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Caddy v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Clausing v. K-Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.