Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. LaTour

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. 01-09496, 01-09230, 01-01622; A131026Published

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Petitioner Sorenson seeks review of a final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board). The order classified Sorenson as a “statutory employer” under ORS 656.029(1) and, therefore, accountable for workers’ compensation benefits for a worker injured during the construction of a house on Sorenson’s farm. ORS 656.029(1) creates that type of accountability when a person contracts for “the performance of labor where such labor is a normal and customary part or process of the person’s trade or business” and the contractor for that work fails to obtain workers’ compensation coverage for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fincham v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Caddy v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Clausing v. K-Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API