Legal Opinion

Blevins v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 22, 1995No. 92-03349 and 92-04677; CA A85779PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that denied him benefits for injuries that he sustained while working on a house that he had been employed to remodel. Claimant asserts that the board erred as a matter of law in holding that he was exempt from workers’ compensation coverage under ORS chapter 656. We review the board’s order for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a), and affirm.

Under ORS 656.027, all workers are subject to the workers’ compensation laws in ORS chapter 656, unless excluded as a nonsubject worker. A nonsubject worker is defined to include a

“worker…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fincham v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Caddy v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Royer v. Touch of Grey RanchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API