Legal Opinion

Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1981No. 78-4612, CA 17980PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, the State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) finding claimant suffered a compensable injury. SAIF contends that claimant was not a subject worker as defined in ORS 656.027(2) and, therefore, not entitled to compensation. Claimant cross-petitions, claiming the Board erred in failing to award, or even address the issue of, statutory penalties for employer’s alleged unreasonable resistance and delay in providing compensation. We review de novo, ORS 656.298(6); Coday v. Willamette Tug & Barge, 250…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Livingston v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Miller v. Granite Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Keene v. InsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Bos v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Nix v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Matter of Compensation of CondonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Bush v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Fincham v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API